an Entity in Data Space: dbkwik.org
Very narrow scope. Not enough people and not enough pages, can easily be covered in WP:WPMU. — Bill william comptonTalk 17:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC) * Aren't these types of pages normally marked with (or something equivalent) and archived, rather than deleted? Peacock (talk) 19:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Not necessarily, e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. — Bill william comptonTalk 20:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC) * I see. The project nominated here seems to have a similar lack of activity as the examples you've given that were deleted. Peacock (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC) * Delete and nothing of value was lost. Gigs (talk) 13:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC) * Delete Too narrow of a focus. Formed out of process. This has none of the "dressing" (templates, categories, etc.) and isn't mentioned o
| Graph IRI | Count |
|---|---|
| http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org | 6 |