This is a proposed policy for the Editable Codex please discuss it in the talk page. The one-revert rule (1RR) is a policy intended on preventing edit warring: Note that a different editor can still revert that part of the page once, but tag-team reverting (having a friend do an extra revert for you) is discouraged as it does not constructively help the wiki. Aside from obvious exceptions (see below), discussion on the talk page should take priority over reverting. In the case of multiple reverts by different editors, it is strongly recommended to take the issue to the talk page to search for consensus. All reverts, but especially re-reverts, are encouraged to include an explanation in the summary and/or on the talk page.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| |
| rdfs:comment
| - This is a proposed policy for the Editable Codex please discuss it in the talk page. The one-revert rule (1RR) is a policy intended on preventing edit warring: Note that a different editor can still revert that part of the page once, but tag-team reverting (having a friend do an extra revert for you) is discouraged as it does not constructively help the wiki. Aside from obvious exceptions (see below), discussion on the talk page should take priority over reverting. In the case of multiple reverts by different editors, it is strongly recommended to take the issue to the talk page to search for consensus. All reverts, but especially re-reverts, are encouraged to include an explanation in the summary and/or on the talk page.
|
| dbkwik:ultima/prop...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - This is a proposed policy for the Editable Codex please discuss it in the talk page. The one-revert rule (1RR) is a policy intended on preventing edit warring: Note that a different editor can still revert that part of the page once, but tag-team reverting (having a friend do an extra revert for you) is discouraged as it does not constructively help the wiki. Aside from obvious exceptions (see below), discussion on the talk page should take priority over reverting. In the case of multiple reverts by different editors, it is strongly recommended to take the issue to the talk page to search for consensus. All reverts, but especially re-reverts, are encouraged to include an explanation in the summary and/or on the talk page.
|