The paradox of entailment is an apparent paradox derived from the observation that, in classical logic, inconsistent premises always make an argument valid; that is, inconsistent premises imply any conclusion at all. This seems paradoxical, as it suggests that the following is a good argument: * It is raining * It is not raining therefore * George Washington is the Pope.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|---|
| rdfs:label |
|
| rdfs:comment |
|
| dcterms:subject | |
| dbkwik:paradox/pro...iPageUsesTemplate | |
| abstract |
|