About: FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Moogle Rhapsody   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbkwik.org associated with source dataset(s)

Delete: Umm... This isn't a spell or even a spell that I know is used by Mobs in the game. Therefor I believe it should be deleted. The page isn't even formatted well... >.> --Nynaeve 10:21, 1 November 2006 (EST) Comment: If we want to keep these pages they need to be written better with the correct formatting for these pages and include the .dat file tagging. (EDIT: I see below Gahoo has included this for you.) --Nynaeve 10:47, 1 November 2006 (EST) Comment: I didn't know >< I'm not a regular FFXIclopedia editor. ~Motokyo 11:09, 1 November 2006 (EST)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Moogle Rhapsody
rdfs:comment
  • Delete: Umm... This isn't a spell or even a spell that I know is used by Mobs in the game. Therefor I believe it should be deleted. The page isn't even formatted well... >.> --Nynaeve 10:21, 1 November 2006 (EST) Comment: If we want to keep these pages they need to be written better with the correct formatting for these pages and include the .dat file tagging. (EDIT: I see below Gahoo has included this for you.) --Nynaeve 10:47, 1 November 2006 (EST) Comment: I didn't know >< I'm not a regular FFXIclopedia editor. ~Motokyo 11:09, 1 November 2006 (EST)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:ffxiclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Delete: Umm... This isn't a spell or even a spell that I know is used by Mobs in the game. Therefor I believe it should be deleted. The page isn't even formatted well... >.> --Nynaeve 10:21, 1 November 2006 (EST) Don't Delete: Not sure if I'm doing this right, but; I am the one who made the article and as far as I know this isn't used by any mobs, but, it is in the .dats as a scroll and it even has an animation. I was actually planning on making a whole list of unused bard songs, such as Chocobo Hum, Jester's Opperetta, and even Minuet V and VI, Will they all ever be useable by bards? More than likely not, but they are interesting to read about and I don't think they should be deleted. ~Motokyo 10:36, 1 November 2006 (EST) Comment: If we want to keep these pages they need to be written better with the correct formatting for these pages and include the .dat file tagging. (EDIT: I see below Gahoo has included this for you.) --Nynaeve 10:47, 1 November 2006 (EST) Comment: We have the {{datfilesonly}} tag for items found in the dat files. If these are in the files they should have this flag and have the exact name of the item, description and level, as found in the dat files. --Gahoo 10:44, 1 November 2006 (EST) Comment: I didn't know >< I'm not a regular FFXIclopedia editor. ~Motokyo 11:09, 1 November 2006 (EST) Comment: No problem. See below for a sample of what each should look like. --Gahoo 11:36, 1 November 2006 (EST) Delete: Unedited to conform to proper template or with {{datfilesonly}} . --Gahoo 10:16, 9 November 2006 (EST) Resolution: Deletion. --Nynaeve 16:45, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software