Conservapedia often employs year-long or even infinite user blocks even for the smallest of violations. For example, one can get labeled a "troll" and get infinitely blocked just for making 5 discussion edits, all of them intelligently discussing the topics in question. On the now-defunct Liberapedia forums, there was a following message: The question is: are such block periods adequate for a publicly-edited wiki?
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Debate:Are Conservapedia's block periods adequate?
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Conservapedia often employs year-long or even infinite user blocks even for the smallest of violations. For example, one can get labeled a "troll" and get infinitely blocked just for making 5 discussion edits, all of them intelligently discussing the topics in question. On the now-defunct Liberapedia forums, there was a following message: The question is: are such block periods adequate for a publicly-edited wiki?
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| dbkwik:libera-pedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dbkwik:liberapedia...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - Conservapedia often employs year-long or even infinite user blocks even for the smallest of violations. For example, one can get labeled a "troll" and get infinitely blocked just for making 5 discussion edits, all of them intelligently discussing the topics in question. On the now-defunct Liberapedia forums, there was a following message: Hello, I am a conservative American! What I am about to tell you, I hope, will not offend you in any possible way. I just got banned two times on Conservapedia; the first ban lasted for a very short time, like a few hours, and the second ban lasts this month...in the year 2015! It seems that Conservapedia's ban limit per mistake/violation is absurd and totally outrageous. What is your ban limit per mistake/violation if I might ask? Obi-Wan Kenobody 08:03, July 23, 2010 (UTC) The question is: are such block periods adequate for a publicly-edited wiki?
|