About: Avatar Wiki:Votes for deletion/Archive 2   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbkwik.org associated with source dataset(s)

As much as I love the series it does not belong on this wiki. It is a FAN creation and no fan creations are allowed on here. I vote for an immediate delete. Jason Garrick 20:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC) You do have a point. That policy applies more to adding fan fiction to articles as if it were canon. Personally, I say keep for now, though I am very open to changing my mind if others think differently. Howabout1-(Talk) 04:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC) Fine the Yugioh Wiki, Naruto wiki, off by heart and some others for sure too, thanks. Joey - Talk 01:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Avatar Wiki:Votes for deletion/Archive 2
rdfs:comment
  • As much as I love the series it does not belong on this wiki. It is a FAN creation and no fan creations are allowed on here. I vote for an immediate delete. Jason Garrick 20:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC) You do have a point. That policy applies more to adding fan fiction to articles as if it were canon. Personally, I say keep for now, though I am very open to changing my mind if others think differently. Howabout1-(Talk) 04:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC) Fine the Yugioh Wiki, Naruto wiki, off by heart and some others for sure too, thanks. Joey - Talk 01:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
dbkwik:avatar/prop...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • As much as I love the series it does not belong on this wiki. It is a FAN creation and no fan creations are allowed on here. I vote for an immediate delete. Jason Garrick 20:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC) You do have a point. That policy applies more to adding fan fiction to articles as if it were canon. Personally, I say keep for now, though I am very open to changing my mind if others think differently. Howabout1-(Talk) 04:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC) Well, on other wikis that are about a show, that too has an abridged fan made series off of it, they usually have it on their wiki, but do make sure that the information on that page is sure to be non-offensive to any reader, and that it is easily seperable from cannon information, so the reader won't think it is or question it, thanks. Joey - Talk 04:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC) * It doesn't matter if other wiki's have it. We're avatar wiki, (the best!! hehe) and I don't think we should be giving any special treatment to anyone. What are some other wiki's you can name that have it? If Abridged is NOT a canon series then it should NOT be on the site. Jason Garrick 01:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Fine the Yugioh Wiki, Naruto wiki, off by heart and some others for sure too, thanks. Joey - Talk 01:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Can we get some other admins input here? I would personally vote to have the policy only apply to adding fiction as canon. Howabout1-(Talk) 02:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC) I agree with Joeyaa and Howabout. I'm the one who added the link to the fanon wiki to the front page and I only meant that to be there for people who wanted to make their own sequels to the series and stuff like that. I think we can keep the abridged series page without compromising the integrity of this wiki. Puragus - Talk 02:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC) It's fan made, so I don't think it belongs here. The chibi shorts aren't canon, but since they were made by Nick, it's ok to have them, I think that TAS has to go. Omnibender - Talk 22:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC) I agree with Omnibender. --8th Mizukage 00:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Personally I really dont see any reason for it to stay. But many for it to go. I'm with Omni on this one. File:Zero Sign.jpg - Zero - Talk 02:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC) I don't think it has a place on this wiki but I think it would be great on the Avatar fanon Wiki. Lord Momo 05:35, 10 September 2008 (UTC) That could work. What do the others think? File:Zero Sign.jpg - Zero - Talk 07:47, 11 September 2008 (UTC) Ya I think we should definitely get rid of it. The article is about an avatar SPOOF, not actual information about avatar itself. So ya i think we should get it off this wiki and possibly on the fannon wiki. Alex101313 20:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC) If no one objects in... a week, I say we delete it. Omnibender - Talk 22:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC) fair enough, though I haven't seen anybody that REALLY wants this article to stay. Alex101313 15:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC) It has been over a week, are we getting rid of it or not? Alex101313 15:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Well, when you read the entire discussion you can see there are mixed feelings about whether it should stay or go, so I suggest a simple vote. How does that sound, because personally it isn't hurting anyone for us to keep it, and a lot of people coming to this wiki will probably be interested in it. I vote keep, what do you guys think? Joey - Talk 04:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC) I say get rid but that's just me. Alex101313 01:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC) This is for Omnibender or any other admins, why dont we just create a template tha says something like "Warning! This article is not canon, and is fan made." Like other wikis use. Scott (Lets Chat) 02:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC) The problem is that all fan fiction articles are supposed to be on the Avatar fanon Wiki, not here. Thats why we're having this debate on whether to delete this article. Why dont we just copy it and paste it on the said wiki. Then we can delete this article from here. File:Zero Sign.jpg - Zero - Talk 07:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC) I'm not against putting it in the Avatar fanon Wikia. Omnibender - Talk 23:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC) Then, lets do it. File:Zero Sign.jpg - Zero - Talk 05:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Fine, I added it to the Fanon Wiki, so the question still resides, will we delete it from here? Thanks. Joey - Talk 08:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC) Well if its about a fan made spoof of avatar and since the admins and users (myself included) strongly believe this wiki is for cannon information only, I think I speak for most when I say delete it. Alex101313 00:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC) So it has been a while, what are we going to do about this page? Delete or keep? Joey - Talk 22:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Right now Joey, nobody can come to a straight conclusion. I would personally like to see it gone. Alex101313 00:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC) Lets Put it to a vote. File:Zero Sign.jpg - Zero - Talk 06:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Omnibender, replying to your question, there is no such thing as cross-wiki redirects, the best you could do, would be to put on the page, or on a heading as a subsection of another page, would be to link to it. That's the best thing we can do, similar to the, main article point right under a sub-heading. Thanks. Joey - Talk 01:12, 23 October 2008 (UTC) Also, we need a vote deadline. Alex101313 - Talk 03:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC) I suggest Friday, Nov. 7. Anyone else have an objection? Alex101313 - Talk 03:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Can somebody please delete this? This has been going on for far too long and nobody is objecting it's deletion. Alex101313 - Talk 15:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Ummmm..... disregard the last thing I said....... Alex101313 - Talk 22:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 1. * Omnibender - Talk 14:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC) (It's already on the fanon wiki, so the info isn't lost, if anything, we can redirect it to that page, is cross wiki redirecting possible? I think so.) 2. * Alex101313 02:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC) (It is not canon, and like Omnibender said, its not like we are getting rid of the info entirely) 3. * File:Zero Sign.jpg - Zero - Talk 03:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 4. * Puragus - Talk 03:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC) (I've followed the argument, and the answer seems pretty clear) 5. * Please get rid of this. Mattkenn3 Talk 01:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software