| abstract
| - It occurs to me that we need some requirements for the Inq page. At the moment, we don't seem to be doing much more than any random user would do. I'd like to see a little policy on what we should be doing. Go ahead and add to my list or object to the points that I'd like to implement. 1.
* Inquisitors need to read every article. Even if you don't enjoy a certain article or subject (Ex:You're not interested in the Galactic Empire), you still need to read it. If there are already seven votes for an article, then you're not required to, but if you're going to vote, you need to read the article. This could be changed a little bit. Maybe we would only be required to read the entire article if we're doing an FA removal process. However, as Inquisitors I think there should be some requirement as to reading each article. If we're going to be a professional review board, we should at least be doing a little more. 2.
* A required amount of articles to be reviewed every week. Each Inquisitor needs to review a set number of articles over a set amount of time. Obviously this would be a ratio of some sort, since we can't know how many new noms there will be. This would also be somewhat optional if there are already plenty of articles with 7 votes or so. Obviously this would need to be ironed out a little bit. We're not exactly getting anything done at the moment. The faster we can get to reviewing old FAs, the better. We need some kind of requirements, as what we're doing is pretty vague at the moment. Please weigh in and tell what you think should be required of us. Let's at least implement some policies so that we can make some headway. Cull Tremayne 22:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
* Exactly. Those who were voted in and put their hand up for Inq work need to start pulling their digits out. We need to get a turnover rate here people! .... 01:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
* One FA review per week. Two (or three?) noms voted up or down per week. How's that sound? Havac 04:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
* That's sounds good, but at the moment, we need to do a bit more with the noms, since, obviously, there's more to handle at the moment than there will be in the future. .... 22:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
* I personally like the idea of weekly or bi-weekly IRC meetings to handle much of our business. I've done a decent amount of Inqing, but we need to get some noms rolling! Atarumaster88 File:Jedi Order.svg (Audience Chamber) 04:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)