| rdfs:comment
| - this article is well laid out, images in a correct place, tidy, easy to read, i'm not good at describing, just look yourself and you'll understand what im trying to say File:Smile.gif, It just so tidy! 11:21, October 28, 2010 (UTC) Support - Well set out, lots of useful images to help describe stuff. Not many articles better than this. File:Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246File:Blue hallowe'en mask.png 10:28, October 29, 2010 (UTC) Oppose - Per degen. 222 talk 09:54, November 17, 2010 (UTC) Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful. --LiquidTalk 03:26, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
| abstract
| - this article is well laid out, images in a correct place, tidy, easy to read, i'm not good at describing, just look yourself and you'll understand what im trying to say File:Smile.gif, It just so tidy! 11:21, October 28, 2010 (UTC) Support - Well set out, lots of useful images to help describe stuff. Not many articles better than this. File:Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246File:Blue hallowe'en mask.png 10:28, October 29, 2010 (UTC) Support and comment - It is pretty good. Tidy and informative. But I hope you realize that by nomming it so late in the month means it probably won't get featured. Candidates need 7 supporters to be featured. It will be a miracle if you can get 5 more. User:-Matt/sig 02:19, October 31, 2010 (UTC) We don't go by months any more. ʞooɔ 08:41, October 31, 2010 (UTC) Oh really? Ohhhhhh, that's what it meant by "New format". File:Smile.gif User:-Matt/sig 04:53, November 1, 2010 (UTC) EXTREMELY weak support - nice article, but it lacks good images.(especially filled with maps) left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 16:26, November 5, 2010 (UTC) Changed to Oppose - I h8 long boring lists... left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 15:36, November 12, 2010 (UTC) Very strong oppose - Check the requirements out again, especially "well written". No offense, but the opening paragraph is no where up to the quality we like on featured articles. That paragraph is all sentence fragments and tidbits, it lacks any real substance. The rest of the article bounces between well written and more sentence fragments. Lots of pictures, but maybe almost too many. When 2/3 of the article is a list of locations it is informative, but again, not what we like in a well written featured article.--Degenret01 10:55, November 10, 2010 (UTC) Oppose - Per degen. 222 talk 09:54, November 17, 2010 (UTC) Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful. --LiquidTalk 03:26, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)