About: Firefly:Featured article nominations   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbkwik.org associated with source dataset(s)

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows. 1. * …be well-written and detailed. 2. * …be unbiased, non-point of view. 3. * …be sourced with all available sources and appearances. 4. * …follow all . 5. * …following the review process, be stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism. 6. * …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc). 7. * …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box. 8. * …have no more than 3 redlinks and no

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Firefly:Featured article nominations
rdfs:comment
  • So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows. 1. * …be well-written and detailed. 2. * …be unbiased, non-point of view. 3. * …be sourced with all available sources and appearances. 4. * …follow all . 5. * …following the review process, be stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism. 6. * …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc). 7. * …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box. 8. * …have no more than 3 redlinks and no
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:fire-fly/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:firefly/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows. 1. * …be well-written and detailed. 2. * …be unbiased, non-point of view. 3. * …be sourced with all available sources and appearances. 4. * …follow all . 5. * …following the review process, be stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism. 6. * …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc). 7. * …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box. 8. * …have no more than 3 redlinks and none in the introduction, infobox, or any templates. 9. * …have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles. 10. * …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. 11. * …have all quotes and images sourced. 12. * …provide at least one quote on the article. A leading quote at the beginning of the article will be required only if there is quotable dialogue by or about the subject. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section. 13. * …include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles. 14. * …include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available. 15. * …pass review by the Operatives. 1. * First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status. 2. * Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources). 3. * Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. 4. * The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue. 5. * Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting. 1. * Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes. 2. * Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination. 3. 1. * If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under, if possible. Failure to do so may result in your objection being considered invalid. 4. * As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied. Also remember to add at the top of the article you are nominating. The next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the template. Nominations that are inactive with outstanding objections for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list by Operatives. __TOC__
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software