About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Coronation Street   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbkwik.org associated with source dataset(s)

Hello. I am not the originator of this article, but I have cleaned it up considerably over the past few days. I just need a few ideas and suggestions to help improve it further. Many thanks. My Tree! 12:13, December 4, 2009 (UTC) Tell me if no one has reviewed it by New Year and I really will. but you already know what I think of it. --Sog1970 23:03, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Coronation Street
rdfs:comment
  • Hello. I am not the originator of this article, but I have cleaned it up considerably over the past few days. I just need a few ideas and suggestions to help improve it further. Many thanks. My Tree! 12:13, December 4, 2009 (UTC) Tell me if no one has reviewed it by New Year and I really will. but you already know what I think of it. --Sog1970 23:03, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
Mcomment
  • Average of the above. An article I rather wish I'd written and wouldn't have done much differently
Pcomment
  • The prose is absolutely fine and the mark would be higher but from personal experience I can say that no one else seems to like tables of characters much - so perhaps the format might be usefully changed. As I said before, if you could work the excellent descriptions of the characters into a few paragraphs I think it would work better. Maybe a typical episode summary, or something of that sort.
Icomment
  • The images have improved but I think there could still be one or two more and I think some more charcter images would help. Or the cat from the credits. Or some notable happening - t'Rovers fire, or t'viaduct collapse. I can rather see a Galapagos Tortoise stretcvhing for leaves captioned as Gail...
Pscore
  • 6(xsd:double)
Ccomment
  • There absolutely must be a Corrie article and this is exactly the sort of article it should be. I could say more, then perhaps no one will tell me off for my useless reviewing skills but what's the point. You really couldn't write a Corrie article that anyone would understand without having seen it and still have it be amusing.
Cscore
  • 8(xsd:integer)
Mscore
  • 7(xsd:double)
Hcomment
  • I liked it, so obviously I found it funny. And I think that anyone British is likely to also find it pretty funny poviding that they have some knowledge of Corrie. No one in America will have a clue what you're talking about, but that's their fault. I like the idea of it being someone who might be talking about their neighbours or about what was on the box last night and I think that works really well which adds to the humour and and the concept score as far as I'm concerned.
Iscore
  • 7(xsd:integer)
Hscore
  • 8(xsd:integer)
Fcomment
  • Hope the delay wasn't too irritating. I don't do this often because I'm told I'm crap at it. I think the very Britishness off the article would probably stop it ever getting through VFH but I would certainly vote for an article like this one.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
Signature
  • --12-30
abstract
  • Hello. I am not the originator of this article, but I have cleaned it up considerably over the past few days. I just need a few ideas and suggestions to help improve it further. Many thanks. My Tree! 12:13, December 4, 2009 (UTC) Tell me if no one has reviewed it by New Year and I really will. but you already know what I think of it. --Sog1970 23:03, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software