If this can be done fairly quickly, I'd be appreciative. I want to redirect the old article, which is crappy (as long as this one isn't also), and count it as a CW rewrite. Thanks. 02:37, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Nuclear Holocaust
|
| rdfs:comment
| - If this can be done fairly quickly, I'd be appreciative. I want to redirect the old article, which is crappy (as long as this one isn't also), and count it as a CW rewrite. Thanks. 02:37, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Mcomment
| - First example, instead of the public killing them, have it be a coal and/or peat moss burning plant. Second, ya can't leave out Chernobyl...maybe it gets assassinated by the KGB, Greenpeace, or whoever, then it fights back and radiates people...yadda yadda, you get what I mean...
|
| Pcomment
| |
| Icomment
| |
| Pscore
| |
| Ccomment
| - Needs some tweaking, but yeah your there almost
|
| Cscore
| |
| Mscore
| |
| Hcomment
| - Meaning, maybe 60-70% there
|
| Iscore
| |
| Hscore
| |
| Fcomment
| - Overall looks great, don't remove anything, and maybe demonize Greenpeace, instead of the 'fearful public'.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Signature
| |
| abstract
| - If this can be done fairly quickly, I'd be appreciative. I want to redirect the old article, which is crappy (as long as this one isn't also), and count it as a CW rewrite. Thanks. 02:37, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
|