About: Wookieepedia:Inq/Things to add to Inq:Template   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbkwik.org associated with source dataset(s)

Just wanted to get some thoughts on this: 1. * Should we have a section on each Inquisitorius FA page for objecting to the nomination? My original intent was that if you didn't support, you just didn't vote for support and objected on the FA nom page. Past FA noms would be different, but I suppose we could have an objection section here as well. It's up to the 12 of us to decide. 1. * Do we want a link to each FA nom on each Inq. page and be lazy? Or should we just go look at the FA page ourselves. I prefer the second option, because otherwise, that means even more updating of stuff, which currently I do almost all of anyways. Atarumaster88 File:Jedi Order.svg (Audience Chamber) 17:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Wookieepedia:Inq/Things to add to Inq:Template
rdfs:comment
  • Just wanted to get some thoughts on this: 1. * Should we have a section on each Inquisitorius FA page for objecting to the nomination? My original intent was that if you didn't support, you just didn't vote for support and objected on the FA nom page. Past FA noms would be different, but I suppose we could have an objection section here as well. It's up to the 12 of us to decide. 1. * Do we want a link to each FA nom on each Inq. page and be lazy? Or should we just go look at the FA page ourselves. I prefer the second option, because otherwise, that means even more updating of stuff, which currently I do almost all of anyways. Atarumaster88 File:Jedi Order.svg (Audience Chamber) 17:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Just wanted to get some thoughts on this: 1. * Should we have a section on each Inquisitorius FA page for objecting to the nomination? My original intent was that if you didn't support, you just didn't vote for support and objected on the FA nom page. Past FA noms would be different, but I suppose we could have an objection section here as well. It's up to the 12 of us to decide. 1. * Do we want a link to each FA nom on each Inq. page and be lazy? Or should we just go look at the FA page ourselves. I prefer the second option, because otherwise, that means even more updating of stuff, which currently I do almost all of anyways. Atarumaster88 File:Jedi Order.svg (Audience Chamber) 17:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software