About: Uncyclopedia talk:VFS/archive2   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbkwik.org associated with source dataset(s)

As i have noticed with the last couple of VFS occasions, it seems that some of the steps of the process of electing new sysops are too long to be reasonable, as most of the users yote within the first few days and then ignore the page entirely until the next step. Take the current step as an example. The current admins are voting for weather or not we need new admins. currently, the tally is at 5-0 admins voting for new admins. All of the votes were cast on November 1st, and nobody has voted since then. At this point, it would seem presumable that more admins are going to be voted in this month, and that we should just move to nominating and voting for the candidates. To make this simple for people, here is a vote on the subject.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia talk:VFS/archive2
rdfs:comment
  • As i have noticed with the last couple of VFS occasions, it seems that some of the steps of the process of electing new sysops are too long to be reasonable, as most of the users yote within the first few days and then ignore the page entirely until the next step. Take the current step as an example. The current admins are voting for weather or not we need new admins. currently, the tally is at 5-0 admins voting for new admins. All of the votes were cast on November 1st, and nobody has voted since then. At this point, it would seem presumable that more admins are going to be voted in this month, and that we should just move to nominating and voting for the candidates. To make this simple for people, here is a vote on the subject.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • As i have noticed with the last couple of VFS occasions, it seems that some of the steps of the process of electing new sysops are too long to be reasonable, as most of the users yote within the first few days and then ignore the page entirely until the next step. Take the current step as an example. The current admins are voting for weather or not we need new admins. currently, the tally is at 5-0 admins voting for new admins. All of the votes were cast on November 1st, and nobody has voted since then. At this point, it would seem presumable that more admins are going to be voted in this month, and that we should just move to nominating and voting for the candidates. To make this simple for people, here is a vote on the subject. Score: +3 Users who think that the VFS process needs to be shortened, and -2 admins, who could actually shorten it * For -- 23:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC) * I'm for shortening the first stage to 5 days, or something. -- 01:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC) * Hey look, something to vote on! for, because I agree with whatever it is they're talking about. - 01:43, Nov 7 * For -- 01:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC) * Against - I've already messed up with the silly dates for this page once. -- 01:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC) * 4 -- 01:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC) * Neigh It's fine, except for that one kink. -- 03:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC) * Five. This is the vote number I have, and also, coincidentally, one more than my vote. -- 23:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC) * Against. -- * For. And can we shorten it to 10 days? By the way, how can I be an admin? 05:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC) * Well, now you can't anymore. - 05:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software